The concept of America operating as a true meritocracy has been challenged in recent discussions. The idea of meritocracy implies that individuals must earn access to basic necessities such as meals, education, and housing, raising questions about whether these essentials should be considered privileges to be earned. Additionally, the imbalance in resource allocation, in public education funding, has underscored the issue of inherent worthiness based on race.

There is a distinction between equality and equity in providing basic necessities such as food water, and education. While equality strives to provide the same resources to everyone, equity emphasizes the to offer people what they need and deserve, acknowledging the varying levels of support required for different backgrounds and circumstances.

Equity is for ensuring a fair society by guaranteeing that individuals receive the resources and access they need and deserve, regardless of their or location. This approach avoids penalizing individuals based on their circumstances and strives to provide fair access to resources and opportunities.

the concept of meritocracy leads people to believe in benefiting from their hard work, the reality is that systemic advantages often perpetuate wealth disparities, particularly benefiting white privilege. This systemic advantage ultimately contributes to perpetuating systemic racism and unequal outcomes, especially impacting children of.

In light of these factors, the pervasive belief in meritocracy has been critiqued foruating racial inequality and systemic disadvantages. It’s essential to consider these perspectives when evaluating whether America truly operates as a meritocracy.