Conversation with Merlin [email protected] · Tue Nov 28 2023

Please provide me with an PESTEL analysis from the view of a sportswear apparel company for example adidas.

PESTEL analysis stands for "Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Environmental, and Legal" analysis. It's a framework for analyzing the macro-environmental factors that could impact an organization. Here's a hypothetical PESTEL analysis for a sportswear apparel company like Adidas:

  1. Political: Regulations relating to import and export, taxes, labor laws, etc., can greatly impact the production and sales of Adidas products. Political instability, especially in countries where Adidas factories are located, may disrupt their supply chain.

  2. Economic: Economic factors such as inflation, exchange rates, and general economic stability can affect Adidas' sales and production costs. For instance, in a recession, consumers are likely to cut back on luxury items, including higher-end sports products.

  3. Sociocultural: Trends and attitudes towards health and fitness can significantly influence Adidas' business. For example, if a society becomes more health-conscious, the demand for sportswear may rise. Moreover, brand perception plays a crucial role in influencing consumers' purchasing decisions.

  4. Technological: Advancements in technology mean that Adidas must continuously innovate to keep their products up-to-date, appealing, and efficient. This can include everything from the materials and processes used in production to the use of eCommerce for sales.

  5. Environmental: Environmental factors like increasing awareness about climate change and sustainability can affect Adidas. Consumers are increasingly demanding that products be sustainably made, which may require adjustments to production processes. This also refers to the company's corporate responsibility towards environmentally friendly practices.

  6. Legal: Adidas must comply with various laws and regulations in the regions they operate, whether they relate to business operations, employment, health and safety, or environmental standards. Changes in these laws could potentially affect Adidas' operations and cost structures.

Remember, while this is a basic PESTEL analysis, each component should be explored in much more depth when conducting a full strategic analysis for a company like Adidas.

Give me 5 bullet points each and dont mention adidas, but think about points which are relevant for sportswear industry.

Certainly, here’s a generic PESTEL analysis for the sportswear apparel industry:

Political:

  1. Trade policies and tariffs introduced by governments can significantly impact manufacturing and distribution costs.
  2. The political stability or instability in countries where production facilities are based can affect supply chains.
  3. Policies related to labor laws and conditions can impact costs and brand reputation.
  4. Intellectual property laws vary globally, potentially impacting the introduction of new designs and products.
  5. Shifts in regulations pertaining to advertising and marketing can influence promotional efforts.

Economic:

  1. Economic growth or recession influences consumers' purchasing power and spending on sportswear.
  2. Fluctuations in exchange rates can impact revenue from international sales and raw material costs.
  3. Inflation levels can affect purchasing power of consumers and operating costs of companies.
  4. Changes in unemployment rates can influence consumer spending on sportswear.
  5. The global shift towards e-commerce can shape marketing and distribution strategies.

Sociocultural:

  1. Cultural perspectives towards health, fitness, and outdoor activities can drive demand for sportswear.
  2. Emerging fashion trends influence the design and marketing of sportswear.
  3. Growing interest and participation in specific sports can create new product opportunities.
  4. Social movements for ethical production and sourcing can impact brand reputation and production practices.
  5. Changing demographic trends, like the aging population or urbanization, can influence product demand and design.

Techn:

  1. Advancements in material science can introduce new types of sportswear.
  2. Deployment of AI and big data analytics can enhance consumer understanding and predictive trends.
  3. Development in e-commerce platforms and digital marketing can enhance sales and customer reach.
  4. Innovation in production technology can improve efficiency and sustainability.
  5. Advances in wearable technologies can generate opportunities for integration with sportswear.

Environmental:

  1. Environmental regulations on manufacturing processes can influence production costs.
  2. Consumer demand for sustainable and ethically produced sportswear is growing.
  3. Climate change and weather patterns can affect sports participation and hence, demand for sportswear.
  4. The need for recycling and waste reduction can affect packaging and product design.
  5. Concerns about carbon footprint can influence the sourcing and distribution strategy.

Legal1. Changes in labor laws can affect production costs and corporate social responsibility practices. 2. Data protection and privacy laws can influence how companies collect and use consumer data. 3. Laws and regulations regarding advertising and marketing, especially for digitally-targeted ads, can impact promotional strategies. 4. Intellectual property laws play a key role in the development and protection of new products and designs. 5. Compliance with global standards and certifications can impact reputation and access to certain markets.

%PDF-1.5 % 1 0 obj <>stream xc``$PPTR~  |@TTd` 24 Hbd K 1@HR6]bg9- L<% E% )I % yEE%)@P;@%D=13O@DwpC2 HA!!aQ7.+111M`, %K-V=V{llPyk &)B/!*xE(Up^p/bHTHI>!S&.{KOEVB%=kU TMTTTu@{N+# kbmMMM_]0irUuMmo_~@}B. g'A[nRXrCYs/Wl*|W]UM~eIZj*>wNvxY$==|E"[|[UrM&l5}]C??sg:?W>w)?02_<: >~~uNi? 4 endstream endobj 2 0 obj <>/Width 144/Length 2124/BitsPerComponent 8>>stream x{P? E|DQQ#7:uh;1j[umMQi5:mFL4>P Wt((,~ ugw{xFCBk~VnJl3c$O`1MOj$f4\TU:$Ine_Z]Y%m8coQ%&HK JJQU?yHMKkT=Q rkC@2wHDD>u HiP)qK T&wZFhJS`z#7NVKTBJ.+`z&&Gy44tR], t9"")ldu</*o;DD " Ed$IE<Lr>|> dou}u j%\}+_m {T{XM1Q!M$ Hl>c&oFGoq[NOwxm .cL^>xs;(]_F9%SIN=WO0yMF2"zuG:'0T>c1WQ}Hdo tH'!1,sat9y^;RUEL_Jq6X=}t5dlAn.SI:Wumhp}&W.v'Q5f-_&{\7^u\5;in& VMjHyDD/MV{""k-er{48Jt dqFa b!h4X9Mq ^& &vn{it).)).)G^ I.*....B32dVw?-XL}t\gHad;rRj? VN ^&M @Q-*8 WEDv*>u h_)3ZymeRQ*rSJbMOg8;@V-wm,yRAy|}!^^yVt#E #qZ}huqKl SVW.&+LuZ;INB?`;a')|bxGYm J\( VM|$uI;L_ErwYoP~[G&8SD##l2GHK&%"5]lVygQ--j{GDg`";J Y.`cA6yu#KXZ"z]j~|uVkcg,yl{8 wI "/NpF2MHcr` `Q"D fyG*u N(9=2#1s!0 >e ?2N ND'ay" wkm>@ )&iz"#I(> endobj 4 0 obj <> endobj 5 0 obj <> endobj 6 0 obj <>stream x+| endstream endobj 7 0 obj <>stream xuAO0,4&4Ql$eNc6Sa!08e)Ga%gVc ES')9OPvqd(E^*%B*ZE!$ ^TNjJJI'},UF4twY2,rqg.:jgp W1#Nd=cagzQ_Xc%if^mG#wS5XUimrbeZ#*?,v=yB UIji^dNK,^p"RM C^:,f36C?L!,~'}~B endstream endobj 8 0 obj <>stream x+| endstream endobj 9 0 obj <>stream x] 0=WqFRQZ5#MmDl^4#MyI0#cD<(FoG YHByaue}7`Ft8\n2zt1@F~[9bVaY7*>Q\|^7L endstream endobj 10 0 obj <>stream x+| endstream endobj 11 0 obj <>stream x] 0=OqFRvT,fp i&A{y~)r?ZJH+D. rh \ZYe <qHG"PC>k3ztA[5+C/Z6x(8l2a\{$2f5[z6 endstream endobj 12 0 obj <>stream x+| endstream endobj 13 0 obj <>stream x] 0=OqFR4uT,fp iH<9-yAP" EM9f8$$y$5Dq_fj@WlPevF{5Qoav/Iejjm2Jv6 endstream endobj 14 0 obj <>/Pages 16 0 R>> endobj 16 0 obj <> endobj 17 0 obj <>/Contents[6 0 R 21 0 R 7 0 R]/Type/Page/Resources<>/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]/Font<>/XObject<>>>/Parent 16 0 R/StructParents 0/MediaBox[0 0 595.32 841.92]>> endobj 21 0 obj <>stream x]ms6*~-C,^exLK;din8E8UVh4O7oGMZ+R5hEh9[ZvN_>~9W/<~w7dS3YVV/BUwiw~Y|}X-roZU/3?~4eDZ4tZZkj).wLAY{kJ,nM3n4=)k.bd_n};P9"NoO[8wft_WW5x-FKncMdE*_iL}VU'3(zZQr@*)X$ai8?Y ?;Q5)[1?541s-`Iiy!C3xL B2X<{0$m+, .O $<d) F Bymr1!vKPe--SX[~M"5\n JLe4c}4sG\8{) #BtO>{F'&YZ3:{-_r$JY#k(~DfzOVPP{+{pG&u 7\h L>;S`<+Ys} GU{n4uKq/$:VW /(76 )i 4o*"<:o5Q5Un-!|0'pSlN?}O]?_-@Gp1 vq ?&#%7=pSgWdwLJh'{=hlsgK X/A" b5JeKez~R`c~1DQZk7g^_?50f2lH7[_ww|M[bC 3cL"/R3G4$[\4};7&_ld>o"Yacg)St/ l"|rLy1eA%m]sG9d|(&H7XPwc6>{_H$nP:3Vds (bw3X~>sm>F,amEKoKh8C:mD,EK1../uoM[hyj/oC d Ng .Ke@?,[O`WmMe{=B~ 6k.rN Wu`>y Bf R2&d=dk7Z""y-wE0<CMwouKp,f\Rey"\_P$~E q>Urhks\P\:\NP%1A4 c9OJQNSA7/?86>jx.x6F~{&7I;uPGq&Nn;?"Fz8A3P4%B<B [^> &mW6z;a?3e: `B#\,1*$<nq |NO$ ;ss 8D967\?> =[46yDZkHzPnOh`E,3[j&9Ff,ixU|[@a(c\:U4Ion *s_2Msg0>4Hv"Ecmu+0!VM#yPOV9cP}I<[80,Jkx@=w)BTI9:8ty"\Cc<6CY!r:|" hyl8da|4$W[^YG+"jkrv0j {p.-/DclA xkJ>Zfn 0yAm|ok}(>grVT.(z_; Z7o~ k.&(F*>/Qa$^ XJk5rsiAn], gNHxnhU| U :&>lDlsgUV-4rz/8P4#NG5H"=YG_zcoo=50P^s= omd1 ^IOg")5(.OPuWMAN>G@ 'pnA$92O<35F3zvo?QJ&VbnsT{W b< ,*kFRQfHkD`S!U-pR#o23S'2<=1;;~j4gxLI= -Tv V#}f0>K["cV /~;1+[b {u;SUC(_ax8dBNW"fqtunR$2 1Zq^68i{'D) b-}7W4c3[.u}nZ]AyYjg5"&f9g>5w3[ |kp_Y.jrE%E>V9'8HejZp`XJ}eElZW19LN1t#hhmwY:}'25/Z_cm>U|0f/Q XKR%e>1iaH|{\/ciuTqB!iFL>8.n+ps<!DaU VhP4 K9|5hxx 67i]#t9GL t !#Wp>LX8 \c*F4$1g~,ur9_~5lqQ&mlZJ[qP`O< m xh%

atlantis-press.com

Nike PESTLE Analysis: As a global leader in sportswear and athletic apparel, Nike operates in a dynamic and ever-changing business environment. From its iconic logo to its generation-defining marketing campaigns, the brand certainly needs no further introduction. However, it is vital to understand the factors underlying its astronomical success.A PESTLE analysis is essential to gain a comprehensive understanding of the external factors influencing the companys strategies and performance. This analysis explores the Political, Economic, Sociocultural, Technological, Legal, and Environmental aspects that impact Nikes operations and market presence.By examining these key factors, we can uncover valuable insights into how Nike navigates challenges and seizes opportunities in a highly competitive industry. Contents Nikes Political FactorsNikes Economic FactorsNikes Social FactorsNikes Technological FactorsNikes Legislative FactorsNikes Environmental FactorsConclusion Nikes Political Factors Nike is subject to various political factors that can significantly impact its operations and performance in the international market. Understanding and effectively navigating these factors is crucial for the companys long-term success and sustainability. Some of these factors include: Political Stability: Government stability and policies in key markets play a pivotal role in Nikes global business strategy. Operating in multiple countries, the company must carefully evaluate the political climate and stability of each market it operates. Political instability or drastic policy changes in key markets could disrupt supply chains, distribution channels, and consumer demand, leading to potential losses for the company. To mitigate the impact of political factors, Nike maintains a diversified global presence, reducing its reliance on any single market and mitigating the risks associated with political instability in specific regions. It closely monitors trade policies and tariffs, adjusting its supply chain and sourcing strategies accordingly to maintain cost-effectiveness; International Trade Regulations and Tariffs: Trade regulations and tariffs are critical considerations for Nikes international operations. As a multinational corporation with complex supply chains, the imposition of tariffs or changes in trade regulations can have significant cost implications. Trade tensions between countries can also disrupt the flow of goods and increase operational expenses, affecting profitability; Labor Laws: Labor laws and regulations in manufacturing countries are of utmost importance to Nike due to its reliance on outsourced production. The company outsources the manufacturing of its products to various countries, especially in Asia, where labor costs are lower. Compliance with local labor laws and ensuring fair working conditions are crucial to avoid reputational risks and potential legal issues. Any violations or negative labor practices within Nikes supply chain can damage its brand image and lead to consumer boycotts. Nike takes a proactive approach to complying with labor laws and regulations in manufacturing countries. The company collaborates with suppliers to improve labor conditions and implements strict auditing and monitoring mechanisms to ensure compliance throughout its supply chain; Copyright and Intellectual Property Protection: Another critical political factor for Nike is intellectual property protection and enforcement. As a leader in the sportswear industry, Nike invests heavily in research and development to create innovative products and designs. Intellectual property rights protection is vital to prevent counterfeiting and unauthorized use of its designs and trademarks. Infringement issues can harm the companys brand equity, erode customer trust, and impact its market share. Additionally, Nike vigorously defends its intellectual property rights through legal actions against counterfeiting and trademark infringement. Political factor

businessmodelanalyst.com

Nike Air Citius+ 2 running shoes. This PESTEL/PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. enumerates opportunities for international growth and brand image improvement, considering the remote or macro-environment of the global athletic and leisure footwear, apparel, and equipment industry. (Photo: Public Domain) This PESTEL/PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. evaluates trends in the companys remote or macro-environment. This environment refers to the sporting goods industry and markets. Nikes business environment presents opportunities and threats, categorized based on the PESTEL dimensions (political; economic; social or sociocultural; technological; environmental or ecological; and legal). Thus, this PESTEL analysis is an external analysis of the footwear, apparel, and equipment company. External factors and trends, such as governmental policies, affect Nikes strategic options and corporate management decisions. The company aims to maximize the benefits of opportunities and minimize the effects of threats on the sporting goods business. These trends in the business environment relate to the opportunities and threats in the SWOT analysis of Nike Inc. Thus, the companys business performance reflects the effects of the PESTEL factors on the shoes, apparel, and sports equipment market. The remote or macro-environment described in this PESTLEanalysis defines the strategic options for fulfilling Nikes corporate mission statement and corporate vision statement. The companys aim for the top position in the sporting goods market requires strategies that account for the external factors (threats and opportunities) established in this PESTLE analysis. Nikes corporate governance and leadership decisions represent how strategies are business responses to the factors ascertained in this PESTEL analysis. Political Factors Affecting Nikes Business This dimension of the PESTEL analysis refers to governmental policies that influence the external environment of the sporting goods industry. The following political external factors determine Nikes strategies: Stable political climate in most major markets (opportunity) Trade barriers due to international conflicts (threat) Increasing government support for domestic manufacturing in major economies (opportunity) The political stability of most major markets is an opportunity for Nikes growth. In the PESTLE analysis model, this external factor equates to minimal or absent government-initiated disruptions in the sporting goods market. In contrast, trade barriers resulting from international conflicts create problems for Nike. Because of their negative effects on multinational business performance, trade barriers are considered a threat in this PESTEL analysis of the sports and leisure shoes company. For example, import quotas andtariffs can decrease the market availability of Nike products in some countries. As a result, this political factor threatens the companys ability to grow its revenues from the sale of its footwear, equipment, and clothing products and accessories. On the other hand, governmental support for domestic or local manufacturing is deemed an opportunity in this PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. This political external factor increases the likelihood of reshoring some processes that the company outsources to shoe factories in Asia. Reshoring may come with changes to Nikes organizational structure or corporate structure, in order to optimize operational efficiency for local or domestic production. The potential benefits of reshoring are emphasized, considering the opportunities and threats in the economic and social dimensions of this PESTEL analysis of the remote or macro-environment of the sporting goods company. Economic Factors Nikes business performance depends on economic conditions and trends. This dimension of the PESTLEanalysis model involves external factors that influence economies and, consequently, the state of the sporting goods market. In this business case, the following economic factors inf

panmore.com

Can you now give me a porter five forces analysis also about the sportswear apparel industry? Try to come up with at least 3 points per dimension.

Absolutely, I'll provide a general Porter Five Forces analysis for the sportswear apparel industry:

  1. Threat of New Entrants:

    • The global nature of the sportswear industry makes it possible for new brands to enter the market, particularly those that can differentiate or innovate.
    • Financial investments needed for manufacturing, marketing, and distribution are high, posing a substantial barrier for new entrants.
    • Established brands have gained customer trust and loyalty over years, making it difficult new companies to compete effectively.
  2. Bargaining Power of Suppliers:

    • Sportswear companies often source materials from numerous suppliers around the world, decreasing supplier power.
    • However, the escalating demand for sustainable materials can provide certain suppliers with increased power.
    • Some unique materials or proprietary technology may only be supplied by a few suppliers, which increases their bargaining power.
  3. Bargaining Power of Buyers:

    • Customers have considerable power due to the vast availability of similar products in the industry.
    • Consumers can easily switch from one brand to another due to the low switching costs.
    • With the ease of online shopping, consumers can compare prices from different brands, increasing their bargaining power.
  4. Threat of Substitute Products:

    • Potential substitutes might include second-hand sportswear, generic/unbranded sportswear, or even casual clothing worn for sport and fitness activities.
    • Substitutes are not an intense threat as high-quality sportswear often includes performance-enhancing technology, comfort, or style that substitutes may lack.
    • However, different types of leisure and recreational activities can serve as indirect substitutes, changing demand patterns for specific sportswear items.
  5. Competitive Rivalry:

    • Competitive rivalry is intensely high in the sportswear market, with major brands continually advancing their designs, technologies, and marketing efforts.
    • Brands differentiate themselves through product design, innovative tech, sponsorships, and branding.
    • The rise of e-commerce has intensified competition as it’s easier for brands to reach consumers, and for consumers to shop around.

5/5 (1) In this article:NKE 107.64 -0.28 -0.26%LULU 431.76 +3.13 +0.73%UAA 7.68 +0.02 +0.26%SPY 455.30 +0.28 +0.06%QQQ 390.06 +1.59 +0.41%UDOW 56.85 +0.24 +0.42%Price After Market Close.DisclaimerNike (NYSE: NKE) is a globally renowned multinational corporation specializing in the design, development, manufacturing, and marketing of athletic footwear, apparel, equipment, and accessories. The company was founded on January 25, 1964, by Bill Bowerman and Phil Knight, initially operating under the name Blue Ribbon Sports before adopting the name Nike in 1971.Nikes mission is to bring inspiration and innovation to every athlete in the world. The companys iconic swoosh logo and Just Do It slogan have become synonymous with its brand identity, representing a commitment to excellence, performance, and determination.Nike operates through various business segments, including Nike Brand, Converse, and Jordan Brand. The Nike Brand encompasses a wide range of athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment for sports such as running, basketball, soccer, tennis, golf, and more. Converse, acquired by Nike in 2003, is known for its classic Chuck Taylor All Star shoes and lifestyle apparel. Jordan Brand, a division of Nike, focuses on premium athletic footwear, apparel, and accessories inspired by basketball legend Michael Jordan.Key SuccessesNike has achieved several key successes that have contributed to its position as a leading sportswear brand:Strong Brand Image: Nike has established a powerful and recognizable brand image globally. The iconic Nike swoosh logo and Just Do It slogan resonate with consumers, representing excellence, performance, and a commitment to sports.Product Innovation: Nike is known for its continuous product innovation and technological advancements. The company invests heavily in research and development to create cutting-edge athletic footwear, apparel, and equipment that enhance performance, comfort, and style.Sponsorship and Endorsements: Nike has forged partnerships with top athletes, sports teams, and events worldwide. By sponsoring and endorsing prominent athletes like Michael Jordan, Serena Williams, Cristiano Ronaldo, and numerous others, Nike has successfully associated its brand with elite athleticism and gained significant visibility.Marketing and Advertising: Nikes marketing and advertising campaigns have been highly successful in capturing consumer attention and inspiring athletes of all levels. The companys powerful storytelling and impactful campaigns have resonated with consumers, helping build brand loyalty and a strong emotional connection.Extensive Retail Network: Nike operates a vast retail network that includes company-owned stores, online platforms, and partnerships with independent retailers. This extensive distribution network ensures broad accessibility to Nike products globally, reaching a wide range of customers.Global Reach: Nike has a strong international presence, with operations and retail outlets in numerous countries around the world. Its ability to cater to diverse markets and adapt to local preferences has contributed to its global success.Sustainability Initiatives: Nike has been proactive in integrating sustainability into its business practices. The company has set ambitious goals to reduce its environmental impact, improve supply chain transparency, and increase the use of sustainable materials. These initiatives align with growing consumer demands for environmentally responsible products.Strong Financial Performance: Nike has consistently delivered strong financial results, with robust revenue growth and profitability. The companys ability to generate substantial sales and maintain a strong market position has been instrumental in its continued success.By focusing on product innovation, marketing excellence, global expansion, and corporate responsibility, Nike has achieved significant successes in the sportswear industry. Its brand strength, commitment to performance, and ability

hivelr.com

A pair of Nike Air Max Classic shoes. This Porters Five Forces analysis of Nike Inc. shows external factors that indicate competitive rivalry as the strongest force in the business environment. The bargaining power of customers, the bargaining power of substitutes, and the threat of new entrants are moderate issues, while the bargaining power of suppliers is the weakest force in the sporting goods industry environment. (Photo: Public Domain) Nike Inc. is examined in this Five Forces analysis (Porters model), in terms of the intensity of competitive rivalry, customers bargaining power, suppliers bargaining power, the threat of substitution, and the threat of new entry in the industry environment. These five forces are competitive forces based on external factors that shape the sporting goods companys strategies. Strong competition affects the attainment of Nikes corporate mission statement and corporate vision statement. This Five Forces analysis reflects external trends impacting the growth of the sports shoes and equipment business organization. Such trends relate to the PESTEL/PESTLE analysis of Nike Inc. For instance, economic trends influence competition among manufacturers and sellers of sportswear. Nikes market position as a leading global business depends on strategic effectiveness in addressing the five forces affecting the industry environment. The external forces of competitors, buyers, suppliers, substitutes, and new entrants challenge the athletic shoes and apparel company. The business strengths enumerated in the SWOT analysis of Nike Inc. help overcome such challenges noted in this Five Forces analysis. Based on the sporting goods industry and external factors examined herein, this Five Forces analysis determines the following intensities of the forces that define Nikes competitive situation: Competitive rivalry or competition Strong force Bargaining power of buyers or customers Moderate force Bargaining power of suppliers Weak force Threat of substitutes or substitution Moderate force Threat of new entrants or new entry Moderate force The intensities of the five forces indicate a competitive market, with rivalry among incumbent companies, like Nike Inc., strongly influencing the industry. This competitive analysis shows that the sporting goods company must prioritize competition and place the least priority on the bargaining power of suppliers, although all five forces are significant in strategic planning. For example, to address competitive rivalry, Nikes generic strategy for competitive advantage and strategies for intensive growth can focus on product development to integrate the latest technologies and advances in materials, such as rubber and textiles. This approach can increase the desirability and profitability of the companys sportswear and equipment. Moreover, Nikes organizational culture or corporate culture can enhance service quality at company-owned NikeTown stores, as part of strategies to attract and retain more customers. This Five Forces analysis describes competitive challenges, although the industry remains attractive, especially for innovative sporting goods businesses. Competitive Rivalry or Competition with Nike Inc. (Strong Force) Competition among sportswear firms determines market share. This element of the Five Forces analysis shows how competition influences the industry environment and the performance of athletic shoes and equipment businesses. The following external factors create the strong force of competitive rivalry in Nikes case: High marketing aggressiveness of sporting goods firms (strong force) Large number of shoes, equipment, and apparel companies of various sizes (strong force) Low market growth rate (strong force) Nike faces the aggressive marketing strategies of competitors, such as Puma, Adidas, Under Armour, ASICS, New Balance, and Lululemon. Many large, medium, and small companies saturate the athletic shoes, apparel, and equipment market. In Michael Porters Fi

panmore.com

Porter's Five Forces Model is a helpful tool prospective investors use to help analyze the industry in which a certain company operates. The model, developed by Harvard Business School professor, Michael E. Porter in 1979, is used to analyze and identify five competitive forces that shape every industry while determining its strengths and weaknesses. The model analyzes and identifies the competition in the industry, thepotential of new entrants to the industry, the power of suppliers, thepower of customers, and the threat of substitute products. It allows investors a chance to learn about an industry's competitive dynamics to better identify an investment opportunity in a particular stock by looking at factors outside the company's financial metrics such as price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios. This article analyses athletic apparel manufacturer and retailer Under Armour using Porter's Five Forces. Key Takeaways Under Armour's main competitors are Nike and Adidas, both of which have historically earned much higher revenue than UA.Although the barriers to entry in the sports apparel industry are very high, UA successfully found its place in the market by marketing primarily to American football.UA's innovation in the materials it uses helps it avoid the disadvantage of buying the same materials at a lower volume and higher cost than its competitors.The company has been able to establish its brand through endorsement deals and stave off the threat of substitute products. Under Armour: An Overview Under Armour (UA) manufactures and markets clothing, sporting goods, and accessories. The company operates in the sports apparel industrya highly competitive industry characterized by rapid growth and strong consumer demand. According to Linchpinseo, the global sports apparel market is forecasted to reach $580 billion by 2025. Headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland, the company was founded in 1996 by Kevin Plank, who serves as executive chair. Plank began the business from his grandmother's basement. The company went public in November 2005 when it began trading on the Nasdaq under the ticker symbol UARM. Under Armour jumped to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in December 2006. The company reported $4.5 billion in net revenues for fiscal year 2020 versus $5.3 billion in fiscal year 2019. Net income was ($549) million in 2020 versus $92 million in 2019. As of Dec. 4, 2021, the company's market capitalization was $10.3 billion. UA is a relatively young company and faces the challenge of competing against longstanding industry giants such as Nike and Adidas. Under Armour in the Market Under Armour must rely on superior product innovation and unique marketing techniques to compete. Its product development and marketing techniques prove UA has been on the front line of changing competitive dynamics in its industry. UA's strategic management decisions prove its desire to be the industry leader in product and marketing innovation. For example, the company has spent substantial money on acquisitionsnotably, mobile technology companies such as MapMyFitness, EndoMondo, and MyFitnessPalto engage with athletes and create deeper brand affiliations more effectively. At the time of the acquisitions, Under Armour became the world's largest digital health and fitness community. Its ability to innovate and provide increased perceived value to its customers is necessary for future success due to the intense competition it faces. While there's no dearth of athletic apparel companies that compete with UA in certain market niches, only a few companies have the sheer size and established distribution channels to compete across all the product lines offered by UA. The largest of these competitors are Nike and Adidas. Both are older companies with higher total annual sales than UA. Revenue for Nike came in at $44.5 billion for the 2021 fiscal year. Adidas reported revenue of $12.2 billion (10.3 billion in euro) for six months ending June 30, 2021. The market caps fo

investopedia.com