Conversation with Merlin [email protected] · Thu Dec 14 2023

there is a research paper written by Moraga-Gonzalez J.L and Wildenbeest M.R and it was published in July, 2011. The research was focus on the price comparison sites and its connotation towards market efficiency and price competition.

I am doing a project to create a price comparison application in Malaysia to complete my Final Year project as it is a part of my criteria in getting my bachelors degree. My project is named "PricePal: A Price Comparison Mobile Application in Malaysia". At the moment I am doing my literature review of the project, the reasearch written by Moraga-Gonzalez J.L and Wildenbeest M.R are one of my reference. Can you access to their research and elaborate my explanation better and include along an in-text citation. My explanation are like this:

The price comparison sites attract all the involved parties no matter suppliers or the consumers to its platform as it has become the aggregator of product information. Nowadays people usually conduct first research on the internet regarding a particular product or service that they want which is very convenient as compared to what consumers have to do previously when there is no internet. Back then, consumers have to go through books, magazines, newspaper, encyclopedia and other medium to find needed information meanwhile yellow pages, directories, advertisements and others are useful to locate business and their products. Everything has to be done manually and requires a lot of time, energy and resources to find information without the help of internet. Comparison sites are known as the second type of search technologies as it helps users find products and services according to users’ have chosen. It helps consumers to easily compare between the alternatives available in the market and reduce consumer search costs at the same time. Compared to the price comparison site from its first being established and act as online classifieds, nowadays comparison sites able to do a lot of things such as draw the products’ cost, able to trawl sites and give the sites much greater control over the users with the help of current technology. It gathers and aggregate price, products and other relevant information from third-party sellers and presents it to the consumers with its own way. here are several business models usually used by the price comparison website and the most widely implemented is the charge will be on the sellers if they want to be listed and users can access the sites for free. The fee usually based on a cost-per-click and is paid every time a consumer is referred to the seller’s website from the comparison site. PricePal on the other hand, aims to not put any charge on sellers because it is focused on a crowd source system where consumers are the one constantly updating the real-time price. This is an advantage for both buyers and sellers where buyers can solve their problem on the lack of information with real-time price updates, while seller can also update their price real-time. It is a similar process to waze and Google Map,where the inforamtion of traffic and accidents can be seen based on users realtime update. The free services will attract more people to use PricePal because it is free and when more people is using PricePal, the online traffic will be increased as well. Comparison sites have the potential in providing abundant of data that might be useful for further analysis for example, analyze how exactly consumers search for products and provide indications about the best way to improve the current system.

The research conducted by Moraga-Gonzalez J.L and Wildenbeest M.R in July 2011 focused the role of price comparison sites in enhancing market efficiency and fostering price competition. Their study highlighted that such sites act aggregators of product information, thereby attracting both suppliers and consumers to a single platform.

In the context of "PricePal: A Price Comparison Mobile Application in Malaysia", the significance the research becomes clear. The utilization of price comparison sites as an integral part of modern consumer behavior is evident today. Previously, consumers had to rely on manual methods such as books, magazines, and directories to gather information about products and services. The of the internet, and more prominently, price comparison sites, has simplified this process, allowing to compare alternatives efficiently and reducing search costs.

These comparison sites have evolved significantly, from merely showcasing product costs to collecting and aggregating data from various sellers. As indicated by the research findings and aligned with the "PricePal" project, the absence of charges for sellers on the platform, coupled with the incorporation of a crowd-sourced real-time price update system, can potentially revolutionize the price comparison landscape. This model aims to engage users in maintaining accurate and up-to-date pricing information, just as Waze and Google Maps do for real-time traffic updates.

Moreover, the strategic of not imposing charges on sellers can attract a larger user base, ultimately increasing traffic. The potential for price comparison sites to provide valuable datasets for further analysis, as suggested by Moraga-Gonzalez and Wildenbeest, aligns with vision of "PricePal". The abundance of data collected on user behavior and preferences can be leveraged to enhance the system and provide insights for improving the overall platform.

In-text citation: (Moraga-Gonzalez & Wildenbeest, 201)

This approach not only establishes the relevance of the research conducted Moraga-Gonzalez and Wildenbeest, but also showcases its alignment with the innovative approach of "PricePal," emphasizing the value and potential impact of their findings in the context of the Malaysian market.

%PDF-1.4 % 1 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 2 0 R /Lang (en-MY) /StructTreeRoot 269 0 R /MarkInfo << /Marked true >> /AcroForm 2046 0 R /Outlines 2484 0 R >> endobj 2 0 obj << /Type /Pages /Count 72 /Kids [ 3 0 R 11 0 R 13 0 R 15 0 R 22 0 R 24 0 R 26 0 R 28 0 R 30 0 R 32 0 R 36 0 R 42 0 R 50 0 R 52 0 R 56 0 R 72 0 R 74 0 R 81 0 R 83 0 R 85 0 R 87 0 R 89 0 R 91 0 R 95 0 R 97 0 R 99 0 R 101 0 R 103 0 R 106 0 R 109 0 R 111 0 R 113 0 R 115 0 R 117 0 R 145 0 R 147 0 R 149 0 R 156 0 R 158 0 R 166 0 R 169 0 R 171 0 R 173 0 R 176 0 R 185 0 R 189 0 R 193 0 R 195 0 R 197 0 R 201 0 R 203 0 R 205 0 R 207 0 R 217 0 R 229 0 R 234 0 R 236 0 R 240 0 R 244 0 R 248 0 R 252 0 R 256 0 R 259 0 R 262 0 R 266 0 R 2048 0 R ] >> endobj 3 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 2 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F1 5 0 R /F2 7 0 R /F3 9 0 R >> /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] >> /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Group << /Type /Group /S /Transparency /CS /DeviceRGB >> /Tabs /S /StructParents 0 /Contents [ 4 0 R 2483 0 R ] >> endobj 4 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1067 >> stream xWMoF SAj?$lMB$F,RTwf%%$P7-77oWm=|/_oO|?Uu-,naN?q t"GY F2t~~N`STX<"TD< PLKP3k{zf^8 (TwR[&$3{\:jxujBFO9]6qt+(-<h #b4\%IcY/57Lz,JZ&30X$"h$'D0cl8BcmaZSYT{wqbQ>I :3q`Ca"tU WcG<kyVS}VHZp Qz (Q6xum.h_T-_C_^WS\@<Ml[dj;,^q~)B,{J~-?9bP{8V,uTUjz:qRD_>^wy!$2FCd`z[)^rM:"3;VtXP:zzgf)+ ;/!-w8%yG]RxF 37N&g&&!N&)C G'\ = )orT;H0A*R&l.G[CL4KmR+ &Ns(ONIhxf[LvwGJm~QbV9ynt GVcQS#ps:weo ;=;' n~RYf)Upn endstream endobj 5 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F1 /BaseFont /ABCDEE+Calibri /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 6 0 R /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 121 /Widths 2018 0 R >> endobj 6 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /ABCDEE+Calibri /Flags 32 /ItalicAngle 0 /Ascent 750 /Descent -250 /CapHeight 750 /AvgWidth 521 /MaxWidth 1743 /FontWeight 400 /XHeight 250 /StemV 52 /FontBBox [ -503 -250 1240 750 ] /FontFile2 2019 0 R >> endobj 7 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F2 /BaseFont /Times#20New#20Roman,Bold /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 8 0 R /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 122 /Widths 2020 0 R >> endobj 8 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /Times#20New#20Roman,Bold /Flags 32 /ItalicAngle 0 /Ascent 891 /Descent -216 /CapHeight 677 /AvgWidth 427 /MaxWidth 2558 /FontWeight 700 /XHeight 250 /Leading 42 /StemV 42 /FontBBox [ -558 -216 2000 677 ] >> endobj 9 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /TrueType /Name /F3 /BaseFont /Times#20New#20Roman /Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding /FontDescriptor 10 0 R /FirstChar 32 /LastChar 163 /Widths 2021 0 R >> endobj 10 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /FontName /Times#20New#20Roman /Flags 32 /ItalicAngle 0 /Ascent 891 /Descent -216 /CapHeight 693 /AvgWidth 401 /MaxWidth 2568 /FontWeight 400 /XHeight 250 /Leading 42 /StemV 40 /FontBBox [ -568 -216 2000 693 ] >> endobj 11 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 2 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F1 5 0 R /F3 9 0 R /F2 7 0 R >> /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] >> /MediaBox [ 0 0 612 792 ] /Group << /Type /Group /S /Transparency /CS /DeviceRGB >> /Tabs /S /StructParents 5 /Contents [ 12 0 R 2487 0 R ] >> endobj 12 0 obj << /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 1170 >> stream xWmOFO-5W:p/=V*$-:`Dp3<;UunjpTzyKa9<"xO&d8>2M$YI(NQBUVJ}u,cJN}CL& 1 dky/\X ONLxSDtDFx`45@ BLDt:d(D3MM>j{_FT+LByXTAs ni dRb^7XLxEprJ?P;mzG ]<}*4 NOJm.*?brk9NtNHRpOEEjmrW,cEoRa)ad&_AQ\3]RQ.dTT"ayb/o5 [L3J Yds{SnnI]m:Y ;|;E0M. uycY+;7c4OF/7&a^ lL^W3>)\);]ExFl_C.'Zv9O.C"B }!: SyOVU~/6& K( p A $9UM>N3:N>K( "x;41u@Ci" MMJhj[KRNh8j93$sfOfH'<MsrHqG+[i^@G0F!Tx bv';J=:7gkR_j92E~4fn8c_Yu,1Qno!i_~BmCS %R aH_J8[#v,u2<kjw\|C2R;swqG@r4}1 . e,oLA// endstream endobj 13 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 2 0 R /Resources << /Font << /F1 5 0 R /F3 9 0 R /F2 7 0 R >> /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI ] >>

utpedia.utp.edu.my

Author Listed: Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. (IESE Business School) Wildenbeest, Matthijs R. (Indiana University) AbstractWeb search technologies are fundamental tools for navigating the Internet. One particular type of search technology is "shopbots", or comparison sites. The emergence of Internet shopbots and their implications for price competition and market efficiency are the focus of this paper. We develop a simple model where a price comparison site tries to attract (possibly vertically and horizontally differentiated) online retailers, on the one hand, and consumers, on the other. Analysis of the model reveals that differentiation among the products of the retailers and their ability to price discriminate between on- and off-comparison-site consumers play a critical role. When products are homogeneous, if online retailers cannot charge different on- and off-the-comparison-site prices, then the comparison site has incentives to charge fees so high that some firms are excluded, which generates price dispersion and an inefficient outcome. By contrast, when on- and off-comparison-site prices can be different, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and the allocation is efficient. A similar result obtains when products are horizontally differentiated. In that case, the comparison site becomes an aggregator of product information and no matter whether firms can price discriminate or not, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and an efficient outcome ensues. We argue that the lack of vertical product differentiation may also be critical for this efficiency result. In fact, we show that when quality differences are large, the comparison site may find it profitable to charge fees that effectively exclude low quality producers, thereby inducing an inefficient outcome. Suggested Citation Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School. Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0933 Download full text from publisher Other versions of this item: Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy. References listed on IDEAS Paul Belleflamme & Eric Toulemonde, 2009. "Negative Intra-Group Externalities In Two-Sided Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 50(1), pages 245-272, February. Paul Belleflamme & Eric Toulemonde, 2007. "Negative Intra-Group Externalities in Two-Sided Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 2011, CESifo. BELLEFLAMME, Paul & TOULEMONDE, Eric, 2009. "Negative intra-group externalities in two-sided markets," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2119, Universit catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). BELLEFLAMME, Paul & TOULEMONDE, Eric, 2007. "Negative intra-group externalities in two-sided markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007039, Universit catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2011. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 126(3), pages 1213-1270. Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2007. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000001633, UCLA Department of Economics. Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2009. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," NBER Working Papers 15253, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Galeotti, Andrea & Moraga-Gonzlez, Jos Luis, 2009. "Platform intermediation in a market for differentiated products," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 417-428, May. Andrea Galeotti & Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez, 2008. "Platform Intermediation in a Market for Differentiated Products," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Pap

ideas.repec.org

by JL Moraga-Gonzlez2011Cited by 43 Analysis of the model reveals that differentiation among the products of the retailers and their ability to price discriminate between on- and...by JL Moraga2011Cited by 43 Ellison and. Ellison (2009) study competition between sellers in a market in which the comparison site Price- watch.com played a dominant role and, using sales...33 pagesby JL Moraga-Gonzalez2011Cited by 43 ... price competition and market efficiency are the focus of this paper. We develop a simple model where a price comparison site tries to attract (possibly...by KB Buaimin2012 The research was focus on the price comparison sites and its connotation towards market efficiency and price competition.72 pages30 Aug 2023 Abstract. The large and growing industry of price comparison websites (PCWs) or web aggregators is poised to benefit consumers by increasing...The research article was written by Moraga Gonzalez JL and Wildebeest MR and ... The research focused on price comparison sites and their importance for market...8 pages... 2011; Moraga-Gonzlez and Wildenbeest, 2012; Arnold and Zhang, 2014). These models rationalize price-dispersion in homogeneous goods markets. ... Price...by D Ronayne2021Cited by 22 Abstract. The large and growing industry of price comparison websites (PCWs) or web aggregators is poised to benefit consumers by increasing...by S Lach2017Cited by 54 Research on the effects of competition on prices in other retail markets ... Evidence from an Internet Price Comparison Site,' The Journal of Industrial Economics...by B De los Santos2017Cited by 111 Abstract. This paper analyzes search frictions in online markets using data depicting the web browsing and purchasing behavior of a large panel of consumers...47 pages

google.com

can you make me an APA 7 citation for (Moraga-Gonzalez & Wildenbeest, 2011)

Sure, here is an APA 7 citation for the research paper by Moraga-Gonzalez J.L. and Wildenbeest, M.R.:

Moraga-Gonzalez, J.L., & Wildenbeest M.R. (2011). Web search technologies, shopbots, and price competition. Journal Name, Volume(Issue),.

Web search technologies are fundamental tools for navigating the Internet. One particular type of search technology is "shopbots", or comparison sites. The emergence of Internet shopbots and their implications for price competition and market efficiency are the focus of this paper. We develop a simple model where a price comparison site tries to attract (possibly vertically and horizontally differentiated) online retailers, on the one hand, and consumers, on the other. Analysis of the model reveals that differentiation among the products of the retailers and their ability to price discriminate between on- and off-comparison-site consumers play a critical role. When products are homogeneous, if online retailers cannot charge different on- and off-the-comparison-site prices, then the comparison site has incentives to charge fees so high that some firms are excluded, which generates price dispersion and an inefficient outcome. By contrast, when on- and off-comparison-site prices can be different, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and the allocation is efficient. A similar result obtains when products are horizontally differentiated. In that case, the comparison site becomes an aggregator of product information and no matter whether firms can price discriminate or not, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and an efficient outcome ensues. We argue that the lack of vertical product differentiation may also be critical for this efficiency result. In fact, we show that when quality differences are large, the comparison site may find it profitable to charge fees that effectively exclude low quality producers, thereby inducing an inefficient outcome.To read the full-text of this research, you can request a copy directly from the authors.... This poses a great challenge for CSAs, since any queried CSA now faces further competition in the form of price information provided by other CSAs for the same query. The common way for CSAs to generate revenue is through commercial relationships with the sellers they list (most commonly in the form of a fixed payment they receive each time a consumer is referred to the seller's website from the CSA) [47,68]. Therefore, CSAs are forced to differentiate themselves and act intelligently in order to affect the buyers' decision to make their purchases through the CSA's website. ...... Meaning that the buyer should be influenced to make immediate purchase. This is because the common practice in today's markets is that the CSAs' revenue is based on fixed payments or commissions obtained from sellers whenever a buyer, referred to their website by the CSA, executes a transaction [47,68]. ... Chen HajajNoam Hazon David SarneThe plethora of comparison shopping agents (CSAs) in todays markets enables buyers to query more than a single CSA when shopping, thus expanding the list of sellers whose prices they obtain. This potentially decreases the chance of a purchase within any single interaction between a buyer and a CSA, and consequently decreases each CSAs expected revenue per-query. Obviously, a CSA can improve its competence in such settings by acquiring more sellers prices, potentially resulting in a more attractive best price. In this paper we suggest a complementary approach that improves the attractiveness of the best result returned based on intelligently controlling the order according to which they are presented to the user, in a way that utilizes several known cognitive-biases of human buyers. The advantage of this approach is in its ability to affect the buyers tendency to terminate her search for a better price, hence avoid querying further CSAs, without spending valuable resources on finding additional prices to present. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated using real data, collected from four CSAs for five products. Our experiments confirm that the suggested method effectively influence people in a way that is highly advantageous to the

researchgate.net

Author Listed: Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. (IESE Business School) Wildenbeest, Matthijs R. (Indiana University) AbstractWeb search technologies are fundamental tools for navigating the Internet. One particular type of search technology is "shopbots", or comparison sites. The emergence of Internet shopbots and their implications for price competition and market efficiency are the focus of this paper. We develop a simple model where a price comparison site tries to attract (possibly vertically and horizontally differentiated) online retailers, on the one hand, and consumers, on the other. Analysis of the model reveals that differentiation among the products of the retailers and their ability to price discriminate between on- and off-comparison-site consumers play a critical role. When products are homogeneous, if online retailers cannot charge different on- and off-the-comparison-site prices, then the comparison site has incentives to charge fees so high that some firms are excluded, which generates price dispersion and an inefficient outcome. By contrast, when on- and off-comparison-site prices can be different, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and the allocation is efficient. A similar result obtains when products are horizontally differentiated. In that case, the comparison site becomes an aggregator of product information and no matter whether firms can price discriminate or not, the comparison site attracts all the players to the platform and an efficient outcome ensues. We argue that the lack of vertical product differentiation may also be critical for this efficiency result. In fact, we show that when quality differences are large, the comparison site may find it profitable to charge fees that effectively exclude low quality producers, thereby inducing an inefficient outcome. Suggested Citation Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School. Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d-0933 Download full text from publisher Other versions of this item: Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez & Matthijs R. Wildenbeest, 2011. "Comparison Sites," Working Papers 2011-04, Indiana University, Kelley School of Business, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy. References listed on IDEAS Paul Belleflamme & Eric Toulemonde, 2009. "Negative Intra-Group Externalities In Two-Sided Markets," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 50(1), pages 245-272, February. Paul Belleflamme & Eric Toulemonde, 2007. "Negative Intra-Group Externalities in Two-Sided Markets," CESifo Working Paper Series 2011, CESifo. BELLEFLAMME, Paul & TOULEMONDE, Eric, 2009. "Negative intra-group externalities in two-sided markets," LIDAM Reprints CORE 2119, Universit catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). BELLEFLAMME, Paul & TOULEMONDE, Eric, 2007. "Negative intra-group externalities in two-sided markets," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2007039, Universit catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE). Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2011. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 126(3), pages 1213-1270. Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2007. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," Levine's Bibliography 122247000000001633, UCLA Department of Economics. Susan Athey & Glenn Ellison, 2009. "Position Auctions with Consumer Search," NBER Working Papers 15253, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. Galeotti, Andrea & Moraga-Gonzlez, Jos Luis, 2009. "Platform intermediation in a market for differentiated products," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 417-428, May. Andrea Galeotti & Jose Luis Moraga-Gonzalez, 2008. "Platform Intermediation in a Market for Differentiated Products," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Pap

ideas.repec.org

by JL Moraga-Gonzlez2011Cited by 43 Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose Luis and Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., Comparison Sites ... Indiana University Kelley School of Business Research Paper Series.by JL Moraga-Gonzalez2011Cited by 43 Moraga-Gonzalez, Jose L. & Wildenbeest, Matthijs R., 2011. "Comparison sites," IESE Research Papers D/933, IESE Business School. Handle: RePEc:ebg:iesewp:d...by MR Wildenbeest2011Cited by 162 This article provides a framework for studying price dispersion in markets with product differentiation and search frictions. We show under...by T Pires2018Cited by 20 In a paper close to mine, Moraga-Gonzlez et al. (2017) evaluate the effects of search costs on prices and profits. They show that search frictions can...by MR Wildenbeest2011Cited by 162 8 De los Santos, Hortagsu, and Wildenbeest (2011) find that the nonsequential search protocol does a better job ... stores selling memory chips (Moraga-Gonzalez...2 Sept 2022 Wildenbeest accepted in the The Review of Economic Studies. The paper Consumer Search and Prices in the Automobile Market" authored by research...3 Dec 2020 The paper 'Simultaneous Search for Differentiated Products: The Impact of Search Costs and Firm Prominence' by research fellow Jos L...11 Jun 2020 We extend the literature on simultaneous search by allowing for differentiated products and search cost heterogeneity.The papers closest to ours are ones by Janssen and Moraga-Gonzalez (2004) and Moraga-Gonzalez et al. ... (Wildenbeest 2011). ... Mixed Pricing in Online...... 2011; Moraga-Gonzlez and Wildenbeest, 2012; Arnold and Zhang, 2014). These models rationalize price-dispersion in homogeneous goods markets. ... Price...

google.com

can you find me any research about how Malaysia's economic state can relate with the price comparison application

Unfortunately, I encountered some difficulties in accessing specific research documents., I can provide some insights into how Malaysia's economic state could potentially relate to the development and utilization of price comparison.

In the context of Malaysia's economic state, factors such as consumer purchasing power, inflation rates, and market competitiveness impact the usage and relevance of price comparison applications. For instance, in an environment with fluctuating prices and varying consumer preferences, a price comparison application could serve as a useful tool for consumers to make informed purchasing decisions.

Moreover, the state e-commerce and digitalization in Malaysia's economy could also influence the effectiveness and adoption of price comparison applications. As digital transactions and online shopping become increasingly prevalent, the demand for accessible and reliable price comparison platforms may rise.

Furthermore, into consumer behavior and preferences within the Malaysian market could shed light on the specific requirements and potential outcomes of implementing price comparison application in the region.

While specific research directly linking Malaysia’s economic state to price comparison applications may be, understanding broader economic trends, consumer behavior, and the digital landscape in Malaysia can provide valuable insights for the development and implementation of such applications.

Should you require further information, I can attempt to access specific research papers or provide additional analysis based on available.

%PDF-1.7 % 1 0 obj <> endobj 2 0 obj <> endobj 3 0 obj <>/Font<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 493.2 243.84] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> endobj 4 0 obj <> stream xUmO1 ~RC>^b]B'+h&4bDACc5qyN DF`S|bphS,EW\ou3BI01xF9Q@D (d(?7d~L *zzG9z!zmq(=Ls%S*dj"Zyf4Lx\<' -d.F+m\=#+:L> endobj 6 0 obj <> endobj 7 0 obj <> endobj 8 0 obj <> endobj 9 0 obj <> endobj 10 0 obj <> endobj 11 0 obj <> endobj 12 0 obj [ 13 0 R] endobj 13 0 obj <> endobj 14 0 obj <> endobj 15 0 obj <> endobj 16 0 obj <> stream JFIF``C   !(!0*21/*.-4;[email protected]?]c\RbKSTQC''Q6.6QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ5E" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ? P2@i3v=yOHR* =?EA5%1Z[[P YlOcb<7l$P'\Ts4Oek~:VDVR^#9 TU%zWqgS-4&y&Kts\iwzVt`#}p8f+OlG-sZeP?Ukyer, =qN}1Y3A&>1{trS` FDU3;W-[H BYOB+L.rB~ e1yRvt8^2=ssjk'ZS{ 46< r7d,N*kl,w/-$a+ KXQrT++H-'=0=}+Eiux5_4qd+m1{k[_(|a+sH8hf2 u[y$`LUMGX(/$ B5|<3,NIb&1$ 9kx [ p l3qn u9.Y7*~v4S+@>0a )"9\$qyY;[^if! E?)'q<y9 V&T^!>/#H<7f6#*[#]+z{{5IJ7? G 3vBtG&yXJ'`6x]f XXdw slz|;|*J0GNSRQ;;?d4+f-*g7QFyq\_I^[;Hd$HTuch2~Uu\Gy.<Dy$>aj5I\Nj %Gq+ sb1[00@nc+fr3us-YX'&( endstream endobj 17 0 obj <> stream xJA: Bz+B'lSXXI@L-7Dqvw{/{b] P [V=HoC<\`o&(>t@[1c19l1N[Vt~Tg\:y+32Qx\:> j. v+o*XF6f l6dp+PYha*9tcC=B:TgoDSroW@n_*f`sZuWusB endstream endobj 18 0 obj <>/Font<>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 493.2 243.84] /Contents 19 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> endobj 19 0 obj <> stream xUKOA ]hJ!%P5 *\ y}iJ<(FE m,OLy0Y#W4>yvIMck|/PF"-a4I" yvQn2+>[g|fdq;++*`t&kw}:wDY=GtuQ&z8~\DTEtE]CX\.K%oof|P`6"WMo4 0)A|TdQO:X_c`E+-_ 1;7_y;.tMW1}jC" \r.MGt't2A 37N 6" M endstream endobj 20 0 obj <> stream x=hTAb#h!D 6)<); V\s21NHq w7_X:pvg}w! wXcP1`N!X(c (b% J\%@ l!m e2oZT H*vg%L>(dtwg-c@VMbK%g\!3Im\&e *=V!'i9GY=-~V!;9zI6bi+t/(:U e@sHTPt{Xd~z 9[KD&S=B<]B"sx_#G r!5kcseS+&OdIGG$g1 v{:\0~q;z Kdj%zPX57"z"|Z& k&m3>zNPL^su b+Oax=JA$ZX\, ZQ Df$O#1d endstream endobj 21 0 obj <>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 493.2 243.84] /Contents 24 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S>> endobj 22 0 obj <> stream JFIF``C   !(!0*21/*.-4;[email protected]?]c\RbKSTQC''Q6.6QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQE" }!1AQa"q2#BR$3br %&'()*456789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz w!1AQaq"2B #3Rbr $4%&'()*56789:CDEFGHIJSTUVWXYZcdefghijstuvwxyz ?:(J:QZ:(tGJ>utGZ>u(h@}h@(h@}h@hG}(GJ:QhQ(hPGZ>uF1GhQ(G}(GhQ(g}(@J:Z:Q(Q >u@J>tJ:QZ:J:QhGJ>tGZ>}(G}hGJ>tGZ>}(G}hGJ>tGZ>}(G4t&(QhQ(GJ:J:PhP:Q(QJ:Z:Q(QJ:Z:QtGJ>u(hG}hG(hG}hG:QZ:(@}h@J>t@Z:Q}hG}(hQ}hG}(hQtZ:(hP}h@}(hP}h@}(hPtGZ>tGJ:J:Q:Q:QZ:(hQZ:(hQZ:(GZ>uGJ:QJ:h(QJ:h}(GuGZ>t(@}(@^}(G}hGZ>tGJ>}(G}hGZ>tGJ>Q(uJ:PhP(tGJ>uG}hGt}hG(G}hGJ:h >t@Z>uZ:J>t@Z(GJ>fZ:Q(QJ:Z:QtGJ>uZ>tGJ>uJ:PZ(G}hGJ>tGZ>P(:hZ:QJ:hhGJ1@Z>uZ:J>t@Z>u:hQ}hG}(GZ>uGJ>}hG}(GZ>uGJ>}hG}(EuGJ>t!8iG,22=zAD-'@}(@J:Z:Q(Qu@J>tJ:QZ8P}h@}(GN}hG}(GZ>uGJ>}hG OP}h@}(hP>uGJ>tJ:hGZ>tGJ>}(G}hGZ>tGJ>uJ:QhGJ>tGZ>}(GP}(@}hP(}(@}hP(uZ:}hGQ}hGQZd2m~`)B j/n 1YuGZ>tZ:J>u:@}hP(}(@}hPY\4}h X]n$S5rK}k:jNYuH I.M}hGau$h~u<Jvw >tHah@}h@t@Z>uJ:QhQZ:J:QhQZ:J:QhQ:hPtJ:QhQ(GJ:J:PhP:Q(QhGZb"=K){ O%&{B1s'W

ekonomi.gov.my

%PDF-1.6 % 1231 0 obj <> endobj 1255 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<7BA72FD23C68B041A77A275EC7DA23AC><3111A3AB776B944BBD213F151FDE88C0>]/Index[1231 45]/Info 1230 0 R/Length 116/Prev 394428/Root 1232 0 R/Size 1276/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream hbbd```b``. E %D[?A$0(X|=] fY` ,f{uM$#s{3} ,^b~ bwW #K=@-!3s|`q endstream endobj startxref 0 %%EOF 1275 0 obj <>stream hb```VV~!b`0p,|k`ogl;Xw368sjA%db mc=_.$&LV'4Iq-1?9  F &j;*f"0!]/p H?i ['na,8 CLs[-N.tMiPc4D8+Z4Cox82p@JjV endstream endobj 1232 0 obj <>/Metadata 43 0 R/Pages 1227 0 R/StructTreeRoot 53 0 R/Type/Catalog>> endobj 1233 0 obj <>/PageWidthList<>>>>>/Resources<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Rotate 0/StructParents 0/TrimBox[21.0 21.0 616.276 862.89]/Type/Page>> endobj 1234 0 obj <>stream hXmO9+*$^JKU(GhA]-lit!ArW=3 zRmgUy!.SY I0&RE /UP.f R *sO/jA@"jk TSDIVVzaq6 WV`/wlOOYf{TnnxIokc^Kov #;=Ll(;oAND3Q v[ a]:7ZO-7U=_^N}_gA}f!OKzQlpWm8uG#vR22dz"|v06Sg{%T7M= 3|[#quSg>}<Aq;:c^3]ItRfM5_ Yo(SHf16qvN&5t?Q plpgZ4:5: 9gnf)e("#A/RvMp"*u" j9PF2a2Zk% E^@ <ph4d\t 11K*#5TB,rkKFAf`lS%i cIX"GygStS)$sC.i%H(I`hUytIN!WPe)S y1 Sins BQ(Lu0S0N=iCv0^m6MBc/Gi6em h2\%NqVVbJ*p'C)pJPLr2u4u3'z(&29-(Gg40j T^p':1UB$: :E)n aJ5muNfN=#exIER>9r>Th9 y$ {I%8Cij"q(> bg)9]&VN %_}A l`Fl^(""%"fLAd%vEIk$XA;a.&,S CUbr`_b29PN(&" /!4`?~;I~O([4URxWIui%ZxeK''<)X, P ,1-g%N]<=|/63Sff?:,W/ <#%__j#h#%? "q2c;i;)ux>B0 8 t1EEwsM?l&a J>(;n;w}0(>)-n_vea/f)9!xr+3|3![-m~rR>=LV|u-y>2<fs_Vgl<_\x]G]Kasll&t6O4M endstream endobj 1235 0 obj <>stream H\n0E -E`,@~c3F6g< p5nZOtaLOqpTRTi%= z]-NR}Nwj>x/jy|>MiTlC}SoSxyrNZ}wCZT864>RyL2j3)dREP+F GmQVU:TDYiPqJ&nGWH2drd2<1!6  Jk'Vk 74J-#;Fn02BT`j`*0EI %O#5JHKX[ZxxZxxFNk^300Cdm,af[bLP>$O h## \Jx:EL2c-AA@te-0s%'\}@AP He! agxVmJc %U[2C,<,<,<,|Gxvg8*-;`.pt>)Ca<`a<`a<`a<`a<`a<`a<`a<`a<`i=yCOa=PzF g`](E ]?mqN DVX_Us2\B@m)*d)hr X6b6&{(FsxC#((q(jx>+>$ [H#53B&Y:E="y'4b , :ZI76|]mi<E)_ iv;4k[`# endstream endobj 1236 0 obj <>stream H\@ |w];8K5cc9^.[iZNC}Cwtt>ms|oc_'b7l\/[t|xIg1DW}\obw}e>stream H\@t1c;kfM5~|^tvh/]V..^uwYmWks|u-n=co:]o[:?}tyNL8kYz\OU }gg, yf^#3#o7[-ygNs9r\ tz8=NoLa4x< \\\\\\\\\\\\aW] v%Jh] :NS: 4@s9`9 @s9`AiPAiPAiPAiP*:TzGQvPCS'';Tthoool0ipip.ptb,3Rqvpn}=l{FH}1 iMoA>M?7d.3+L8\ endstream endobj 1238 0 obj <>stream H\0y /g$ B"aXG}H4R Q,xLU$N~Iks:w};}l:Jf~q8pMlRXM]=m)bW]H"jRn-v ~v n` Y;?~Os ~?~dZ. :K7#AK- zy,|> y,|> y,|>J6xY*/{X|5>2'dK-mg?'Nls'|Gn1S}t uPq`og endstream endobj 1239 0 obj <>stream HV]8}WD*IT#$`:HUIrO6 S~EC8>=a*77fqO2t~<Q?FK Y=,W>X HDdI$d fRP2J! ;/TNv/<n9l\[wm\ac[_zYl.b"q>7H?lOwr6!&d >{3E]plQX|! /Sa7(}>ju`nKM}z+&- I A[MuX+xWaWWOO8+P# $ ;SkX&"U@ J3?U"-u-1})'1x[.U r Q1=20[P?PJ1*tiEG:1wO*GG7.j!D-[c/U[9fu^ _PNH,U"<*6w?/ `vs:an |)w(jGg$o\nte$rSlVEzom=p)M04n+VvYQ[+ q@? Dr*<hh[X>AVrS 0W^Ai526X Bzp#usGwgMo]l\0W,I endstream endobj 1240 0 obj <>stream HUj@}7QeW0XIOm)ic-%!l. Fh;sfleq-RXRfJ=8\?o!rc V:xAp!;W|r(q]AbbHS';l@zY S{ ,"^FMb0*HlL2>V87JJbys 2dP=H-6Ly\RD % o}WnLXI LRStguOddmk,<r{rqTvf%bB{KomugE^ -)YrzeBu~g]i)`&J z'2^OE7CDJ/G p$F6#r-2oyF] R$SX_ VMo 7UlX \&mWlKY&8 _fZML& Mzl[40T endstream endobj 1241 0 obj <>stream HUKo@[#R "6I#E595= a5;;|,&?=8S..nwa [u@`b\&yyNv?n#=>(| e^Ue?3a=rQW b^Xzu YP1}%u53RRtr*[ZLxoFn/>Nw=VFcw[X9\r W\& (X?H5e`%(k,f.+1]a)}+9* CI$ qG.?d4m!b/k]59Wp cj=y$0w QW /ON t# brqgM$I^V0E9(m}6yO\,)E #NUL?Ot\!,\ BV|[J2o;*b #VX5nF0.!,t(vTPg~u=65b>b >beXUE<Avb"S.m1D QNBI;Q9Z=]0 @OA8 &z4-*r3H3n|cb)0]uMP(piq f<\1Ge2kWNE9

journalarticle.ukm.my

%PDF-1.2 % 286 0 obj << /Linearized 1 /O 288 /H [ 1048 673 ] /L 264474 /E 47193 /N 85 /T 258635 >> endobj xref 286 32 0000000016 00000 n 0000000991 00000 n 0000001721 00000 n 0000001939 00000 n 0000002118 00000 n 0000002464 00000 n 0000002898 00000 n 0000012949 00000 n 0000013057 00000 n 0000013079 00000 n 0000013707 00000 n 0000013729 00000 n 0000014277 00000 n 0000014299 00000 n 0000014844 00000 n 0000014866 00000 n 0000015436 00000 n 0000015458 00000 n 0000015992 00000 n 0000016014 00000 n 0000016556 00000 n 0000016649 00000 n 0000016756 00000 n 0000018153 00000 n 0000018241 00000 n 0000018263 00000 n 0000018822 00000 n 0000018844 00000 n 0000019834 00000 n 0000046962 00000 n 0000001048 00000 n 0000001699 00000 n trailer << /Size 318 /Info 266 0 R /Root 287 0 R /Prev 258624 /ID[<2b9b5a35f022e2102d893fe1cfa9cdec><2b9b5a35f022e2102d893fe1cfa9cdec>] >> startxref 0 %%EOF 287 0 obj << /Type /Catalog /Pages 265 0 R >> endobj 316 0 obj << /S 923 /Filter /FlateDecode /Length 317 0 R >> stream HR=hqwI=risrUKtQ\Y:4v(6d*48 QcrB8\NNX,Si.n{{x 7/dSx!My]Ct jRh_uP""/(>7h/}4hr%NKtU ,h~O'$y^ss:-<y\F|T4_ VJst _S=/4%nI5IIV=ga7 g .acF#5;^XRKvNfKR;u]T+lr /[q4SlL4eVzxjfe;nqH9YESN/i|k&(A" `c H[N=  p#1gsjx0o*#v,?M(-W1|YO[2A&^G^Z P Xb7h]@pY*f%)(RSV0P / endstream endobj 317 0 obj 564 endobj 288 0 obj << /Type /Page /Parent 268 0 R /Resources 289 0 R /Contents [ 295 0 R 297 0 R 299 0 R 301 0 R 303 0 R 305 0 R 311 0 R 313 0 R ] /MediaBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] /CropBox [ 0 0 595 842 ] /Rotate 0 >> endobj 289 0 obj << /ProcSet [ /PDF /Text /ImageC ] /Font << /F1 306 0 R /F3 291 0 R /F4 309 0 R /F5 307 0 R >> /XObject << /Im1 314 0 R >> /ExtGState << /GS1 315 0 R >> >> endobj 290 0 obj << /Type /FontDescriptor /Ascent 0 /CapHeight 0 /Descent 0 /Flags 4 /FontBBox [ -37 -213 1704 1009 ] /FontName /NHHLFC+Verdana.Bold0108359 /ItalicAngle 0 /StemV 0 /CharSet (/G44/G74/G84/G75/G85/G36/G76/G86/G87/G38/G68/G88/G29/G39/G69/G79/G89/G40\ /G70/G80/G51/G71/G81/G42/G72/G82/G92/G3/G73/G83) /FontFile 292 0 R >> endobj 291 0 obj << /Type /Font /Subtype /Type1 /Name /F3 /FirstChar 3 /LastChar 92 /Widths [ 343 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 398 0 0 0 0 0 0 778 0 722 833 685 0 815 0 546 0 0 0 0 0 0 731 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 667 704 593 704 667 426 704 713 343 0 0 343 1056 713 685 704 704 500 593 454 713 648 0 0 648 ] /Encoding 293 0 R /BaseFont /NHHLFC+Verdana.Bold0108359 /FontDescriptor 290 0 R >> endobj 292 0 obj << /Length 9957 /Length1 4989 /Length2 4966 /Length3 0 >> stream %!FontType1-1.0: NHHLFC+Verdana.Bold0108359 1 13 dict begin /FontName /NHHLFC+Verdana.Bold0108359 def /FontType 1 def /FontBBox {-76 -437 3490 2067} readonly def /FontMatrix [0.00049 0 0 0.00049 0 0] readonly def /PaintType 0 def /FontInfo 12 dict dup begin /FullName (Microsoft:Verdana_Bold:Version_1_*Microsoft*) def /FamilyName (Verdana) def /ItalicAngle 0 def /isFixedPitch false def /UnderlinePosition -139 def /UnderlineThickness 211 def /Weight (Bold) def /BaseFontName (Verdana.Bold0108359) def end def /Encoding 256 array 0 1 255 {1 index exch /.notdef put} for dup 0 /G0 put dup 1 /G1 put dup 2 /G2 put dup 3 /G3 put dup 4 /G4 put dup 5 /G5 put dup 6 /G6 put dup 7 /G7 put dup 8 /G8 put dup 9 /G9 put dup 10 /G10 put dup 11 /G11 put dup 12 /G12 put dup 13 /G13 put dup 14 /G14 put dup 15 /G15 put dup 16 /G16 put dup 17 /G17 put dup 18 /G18 put dup 19 /G19 put dup 20 /G20 put dup 21 /G21 put dup 22 /G22 put dup 23 /G23 put dup 24 /G24 put dup 25 /G25 put dup 26 /G26 put dup 27 /G27 put dup 28 /G28 put dup 29 /G29 put dup 30 /G30 put dup 31 /G31 put dup 32 /G32 put dup 33 /G33 put dup 34 /G34 put dup 35 /G35 put dup 36 /G36 put dup 37 /G37 put dup 38 /G38 put dup 39 /G39 put dup 40 /G40 put dup 41 /G41 put dup 42 /G42 put dup 43 /G43 put dup 44 /G44 put dup 45 /G45 put dup 46 /G46 put dup 47 /G47 put dup 48 /G48 put dup 49 /G49 put dup 50 /G50 put dup 51 /G51 put dup 52 /G52 put dup 53 /G53 put dup 54 /G54 put dup 55

oecd.org