Subject: Urgent: Persistent Issues on UoPeople Discussions Substantıal post followıng Dear Professor [Professor's Last Name], I trust this message finds you well. I am writing to bring to your attention a recurring issue affecting the quality of our class forum discussions. There is a consistent pattern of fellow students failing to adhere to the recommended contribution days, struggling to utilize UoPeople technology effectively to track substantial replies, and displaying a tendency to provide unfounded and occasionally abusive feedback against their peers. One specific classmate, Rosalyn, consistently misses discussions, particularly before the recommended Sundays, and fails to acknowledge my substantial post along with the subsequent three feedback posts. UoPeople's technology, equipped with features like 'new to oldest,' 'old to new,' 'threaded,' and accessing posts through the 'forum posts' profile (as found here: https://my.uopeople.edu/user/view.php?id=358161&course=7347), offers convenient methods to reach my latest substantial post [here] or view all posts. However, it appears that some students overlook these technologies when attempting to access substantial posts or read feedback from others. While I appreciate Rosalyn's enjoyment of recent contribution by me, she consistently fails to locate my substantial and feedback posts, leading to a misalignment in her rubric evaluation.

For your reference, please find my substantial response here, which not only includes my rubric answers but also features an attachment, (Vildan_Defensive Comment-UNIT8.pdf), defending how my substantial reply aligns with the rubric. I take pride in consistently adhering to perfect APA style, both in-text and reference listing, throughout the course. I greatly appreciate your attention to this matter. Thank you. please check grammar