I don't have direct access to the content of specific academic papers, including "Using Web Speech technology with language learning applications" by Daniels, P. However, I can provide general information about the typical components of such papers.

1. Algorithm Used: The paper may present the algorithm or approach used to integrate Web Speech technology with language learning applications. Possible algorithms could include speech recognition algorithms, natural language processing algorithms, or machine learning algorithms for language analysis and synthesis.

2. Why Chose These Algorithms: The author may have selected these algorithms due to their suitability for processing spoken language, their accuracy or efficiency, or their capability to adapt to different accents or languages.

3. Expected Output or Result: The expected output or result could be improved speech recognition accuracy, enhanced language learning experiences for users, increased interactivity in language learning applications, or a combination of these and other potential benefits.

4. Limitations of the Article: The limitations of the paper may include constraints in the implemented, potential biases in the experimental setup, constraints in the scope of the study, or limitations in the generalizability of the findings.

For more detailed information about the specific paper, accessing the original source or its abstract would be necessary.

I don't have direct access to the content of specific academic papers, including "Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: a user evaluation of the busuu app" by Rosell-Aguilar, F. However, I can provide general insights.

1. Algorithm Used: The paper might discuss algorithms related to autonomous language learning, such as adaptive learning algorithms, natural language processing algorithms for user feedback analysis, or algorithms for personalized content delivery.

2. Why Chose These Algorithms: The author may have chosen these algorithms based on their ability to personalize language learning experiences, analyze user interactions, and optimize content delivery to maximize learning outcomes.

3. Expected Output or Result: The expected output or result could include improved user engagement increased language proficiency, personalized learning pathways, and enhanced user satisfaction with the mobile application.

4. Limitations of the Article: The limitations of the paper may involve constraints in the user evaluation methodology, potential biases in user perceptions, limited generalizability of findings, and constraints in the scope of the study.

For more detailed information, referencing the original source or its abstract would be necessary.

I don't have direct access to the content of specific academic papers, including "NEW TOOLS FOR ETANDEM IN LANGUAGE LEARNING: A THEORETICAL STUDY" by Cintemir, N., & Moralı, G. However, I can provide some general insights.

1. Algorithm Used: The paper might discuss theoretical frameworks or conceptual models rather than specific algorithms. Possible areas could include language learning pedagogy, human-computer interaction theories, or educational psychology theories related to eTandem language learning.

2. Why Chose These Algorithms: If algorithms are not the focus, the authors have chosen these theoretical frameworks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential impact and effectiveness of new tools for eTandem language learning.

3. Expected Output or Result: The expected output or result could include theoretical insights into the application of new tools for eTandem language learning, potential frameworks for designing and evaluating language learning tools, or theoretical implications for language learning research and practice.

4. Limitations of the Article: The limitations of the paper may involve constraints in the theoretical study's applicability to real-world language learning contexts, potential gaps in empirical validation of the theoretical frameworks, or limitations in addressing practical implementation challenges of the new tools for eTandem language learning.

For more detailed information, referring to the original source or its abstract would be.

I don't have direct access to the content of specific academic papers, including "Mobile assisted language learning (MALL): teacher uses of smartphone applications (apps) to support undergraduate students’ English as a foreign language (EFL) vocabulary development" by Wardak, M. However, I can provide some general insights.

1. Algorithm Used: The paper may involve the use of language learning apps and educational technology rather than specific algorithms. The focus might be on app features, adaptive learning technologies, or natural language processing capabilities within the apps.

2. Why Chose These Algorithms: If specific algorithms are not the focus, the author may have chosen these technologies based on their potential to provide interactive and personalized learning experiences, support vocabulary acquisition through spaced repetition or context-based learning, and offer real-time feedback to students.

3. Expected Output or Result: The expected output or result might include improved EFL vocabulary acquisition among undergraduate students, enhanced engagement and motivation, increased self-directed learning, and potential insights into the effectiveness of specific apps in supporting language learning.

4. Limitations of the Article: The limitations of the paper may concern potential biases in teacher perceptions, constraints in generalizing findings to other contexts, limitations in addressing diverse learning styles, and potential challenges in app implementation and integration into existing curricula.

For more detailed information, referencing the original source or its abstract would be necessary.

I don't have direct access to the content of specific academic papers, including "Applications of Social Media to Learn Speaking" by Kuning, D. S. However, I can provide some general insights.

1. Algorithm Used: The paper may not explicitly involve specific algorithms, as it focus more on the applications of social media for language learning rather than algorithmic processes.

2. Why Chose These Algorithms: If algorithms are not the focus, the author may have chosen to explore the potential of social media platforms for language learning due to their widespread usage, accessibility, and opportunities for authentic communication and interaction in spoken language.

3. Expected Output or Result: The expected output or result might include insights into leveraging social media for speaking practice, potential enhancements in learners' oral proficiency, increased engagement through social media platforms, and potential implications for modern language teaching practices.

4. Limitations of the Article: The limitations of the paper might involve constraints in generalizing findings to different social media platforms, potential privacy or ethical considerations related to using social media for educational purposes, and limitations in addressing the diverse learning needs of language learners through social media.

For more detailed information, referencing the original source or its abstract would be necessary.